Patna High CourtCWJC/934/2017disposed

M/S Dhaneshwar Nath Construction v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-03Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.934 of 2017 ======================================================

1. M/s Dhaneshwar Nath Construction through managing partner Rajiv Ranjan Singh, S/O Anudrika Prasad Singh, resident of Lalit Niketan, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, P.S. - Patrakar Nagar, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, district in the town of Patna 800026.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Vishwesraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Vishwesraiya Bhawan, Baily Road , Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Vishwesraiya Bhawan, 5th Floor, Baily Road, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Rural Work Circle, Aurangabad, Bihar.

5. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Rural Work Circle, Aurangabad, Bihar.

6. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Rural Work Circle, Near Haj Bhawan, Barrack NO. 1 & 2 Patna, Bihar.

7. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division, Masauri, District - Patna, Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Dayal Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt. Archana Meenakshee- GP6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-11-2017 In view of the order dated 30.10.2017 the State has filed supplementary counter affidavit stating therein that recommendation has been made for deletion of the name of the petitioner from item no.728 of the debarred list. It is expected that the respondent authority will honour of his commitment which has been mentioned in the supplementary counter affidavit and pass necessary order in

Patna High Court CWJC No.934 of 2017 (11) dt.03-11-2017 this regard. If the State would fail to pass such final order deleting the name of the petitioner from item no.728, the petitioner will be at liberty to file an application for revival of the case.

With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U