Anuradha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.378 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8781 of 2019 ====================================================== Anuradha Kumari Wife of Late Ram Balak Prasad Resident of Village Agat, P.S. Halsi, District- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary (Education Department Govt. of Bihar namely Rajnish Kumar Mahajan.

2.

The District Magistrate Lakhisarai District Lakhisarai namely Shobhendra Kumar Chaudhary.

3.

The Chairman Cum District Magistrate, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Lakhisarai District Lakhisarai namely Shobhendra Kumar Chaudhary 4.

The District education Officer Lakhisarai Namely Sunaiya Kumari. 5.

The District Programme Officer (Estt) Lakhisarai namely Ramesh Paswan. 6.

The Block Development Officer Halsi District Lakhisarai namely Pritam Anand.

7.

The Block Education Officer, Halsi District Lakhisarai namely Prafulla Kumar.

8.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Dhira, P.S. Halsi District Lakhisarai namely9.

The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Dhira, P.S. halsi namely Vakil Yadav.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Kumar (Gp 17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 It is the petitioner's grievance that order dated 04.07.2019, passed in CWJC No. 8781 of 2019, titled as Anuradha Kumari Vs. the State of Bihar & Ors. has not been complied with.

In the considered view of the Court, the present

Patna High Court MJC No.378 of 2020(2) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 petition is not maintainable in view of the fact that the opposite parties have already complied with the order dated 04.07.2019, passed in CWJC No. 8781 of 2019, titled as Anuradha Kumari Vs. the State of Bihar and Ors. Pursuant to the said order, the opposite parties have passed an order dated 22.06.2020, issued by District Programme Officer (Establishment), Lakhisarai, (Annexure-10 of the show cause dated 21.07.2020). As such, it cannot be said that the opposite parties have not taken any steps or that there is willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court.

The present petition stands dismissed.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) Ashwini/Sujit U