Aditya Narayan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9005 of 2018 ====================================================== Aditya Narayan Mishra son of Late Ram Byash Mishra resident of village - Gajrahi, P.O. - Devdhiya, P.S. Rajpur, District - Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Under Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6. The Director (Administration)-cum-Additional Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
7. The Joint Director (Agronomy), Department of Agriculture, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
8. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
9. The District Agriculture Officer, Muzaffarpur.
10. The Sub-Divisional Agriculture Officer, Madhubani.
11. The Assistant Director (Agronomy), District Agriculture Office, Muzaffarpur.
12. The Block Development Officer, Keshariya, District - East Champaran.
13. The In-Charge Officer (PCRC), Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.
14. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Muzaffarpur.
15. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad -GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-05-2018 Heard.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.9 and the respondent
Patna High Court CWJC No.9005 of 2018 (2) dt.11-05-2018 2/2 no.9 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame.
Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a representation before the respondent no.9 regarding his grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.9 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- Md Rashid U