← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18713/2016disposed

Union Of India v. Narendra Kumar Singh And ORS

2017-01-09Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18713 of 2016 =========================================================== Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension Department of Personnel and Training, New Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Narendra Kumar Singh son of Late Sarbdeo Singh resident of village Dumaria, P.S. Tarai, District Bhojpur, at present posted as District Magistrate, Araria.

2. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Additional Solicitor General Mrs. Kanak Verma, CGC For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 09-01-2017 Heard Sri S.D. Sanjay, Additional Solicitor General representing Union of India.

2. He has produced the order dated 27.12.2016, which has been issued under the signature of the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension. It is his stand and contention that this order has been passed as part of the compliance of the directive issued by the Central Administrative Tribunal on 27.10.2016 in C.P. No. 050/00106/2015 arising out of O.A. No. 799 of 2013.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18713 of 2016 dt.09-01-2017 2/2

3. The Union of India would be well advised to produce the above order, may be by way of an affidavit, before the Tribunal and the Tribunal will apply its judicious mind whether it amounts to sufficient compliance regarding its directives or not.

4. Counsel representing the private respondent submits that he has no objection as such to the directive, which is being issued by the Court in the given facts, which is emerging before this Bench today.

5. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation.

6. The order dated 27.12.2016 of the Ministry is placed on record for any future reference.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/ S. Kumar AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.01.2017 Transmission Date NA