Kudusiya Ejaj @ Qudsia Ejaj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14323 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2024 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Kudusiya Eja @ Qudsia Ejaj, W/O Syed Ejaz Ahmed, Resident of VillageRahmat Nagar Basainpur, P.S- Asansol, District- Vardman, Bardman, West Bengal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 307/2024, registered for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336,(3) and 340(2) of the BNS 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the grandfather of the informant namely Sayed Mohammad Umaid Raza has purchased land for his two minor sons. That land was not partitioned between uncle and father of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14323 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/3 informant. The father of the informant (Saiyad Mohammad Kamar Raza) died in the year 2009. It is further alleged that the mother of the informant remarried with one Saiyad Ejaz Ahmad. The petitioner had sold the land to the co-accused Abhimanyu Kumar @ Manu having no title over it.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and she has falsely been implicated in this case. It has also been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is a case of civil nature. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. In trial it will be seen whether the petitioner was having title over the land or not.
5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 307/2024, she will be enlarged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14323 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 3/3 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T