← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8852/2019bail granted

Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8852 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2018 Thana- AZIMABAD District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sunita Kumari, aged about 31 Years, Female, Daughter of Shailendra Singh, Wife of Chandan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-Moapkalan, Moan Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sada Nand Roy, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that Sunita Kumari (petitioner) at present is posted as Panchayat Shikshika at Primary School, Chipura. The marks-sheet of Sunita Kumari was found fake and false. The total marks which the petitioner got in Intermediate was 538 which was manipulated to 713 and the Division of the petitioner was changed to 2nd Division to Ist Division. The petitioner cheated with the appointment unit. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8852 of 2019(2) dt.21-02-2019 2/2 There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is alleged to have submitted incorrect marks-sheet in respect of Intermediate. The petitioner claims that the said allegation is wrong. At the time of appointment, marks-sheet of the petitioner was verified and no such objection was raised at the time of joining. The present case has been instituted due to mistake of fact. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- VIII, Ara (Bhojpur), in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No. 51 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T