← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18753/2016disposed

Nand Kumar Niraj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-06-27Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18753 of 2016 ====================================================== Nand Kumar Niraj son of Sri Bishundeo Sah resident of Village- Bhawra, P.O.- Amrita, P.S.- Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 5.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

6.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Saharsa. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa Raaj, District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy No-1 SC 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned. 2.

The petitioner has filed the present writ application for directing Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa to comply with the letter dated 26.11.2014, issued by District Programme Officer, Primary Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bihar Education Scheme, Saharsa, by which he was directed to ensure that all the accounts of School must be operated by petitioner until the building of School is constructed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18753 of 2016(5) dt.27-06-2024 2/2 3.

In view of the nature of dispute, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the District Appellate Authority, by filing an appeal, raising his grievances.

4.

It is made clear that if an appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, along with a petition for condonation of delay, the District Appellate Authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the person(s) concerned.

5.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U