Raju Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5568 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RAJU CHAUDHARY, Male, 30 Years, Son of Late Naresh Chaudhary Resident of Village- Sakardih (Sakaddi), Police Station, Koilwar, District, Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Excise Case No.56 of 2019 (Bhojpur) registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is recovery of 60.480 litres country-made liquor near the house of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 08.01.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5568 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Excise Case No.56 of 2019 (Bhojpur), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T