← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4941/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Sri Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4941 of 2020 ====================================================== Sri Ashok Kumar S/o Sri Shivshankar Singh Resident of H. No.- 8, Nav Vikas Lane, Mohalla- Ashiyana Nagar, Post- Ashiyana Nagar, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna / Permanent Address Vill- Dulfa P.O.- Khocharihan, DistrictBuxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar.

2.

The Chief Executive Officer cum Mission Director, Lohiya Swachh Bihar Abhiyan, 1st Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

State Co-ordinator, Lohiya Swachh Bihar Abhiyan, Ist Floor Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

District Magistrate-cum-President, D.W.S.C. Buxar. 5.

District Development Commissioner, Vice President, D.W.S.C. Buxar. 6.

Block Development Officer, Navanagar, Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (GA2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, counsel for State is present.

2. Vide order dated 29.03.2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that

Patna High Court CWJC No.4941 of 2020(4) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U