Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8669/2022bail granted

Lutan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-10Mr. Justice Khatim Reza2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8669 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2021 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== Lutan Yadav Son Of Dhanushdhari Yadav @ Dhanudhari Yadav R/O VillageSati Asham, P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in short is that accused persons including the petitioner caused death of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Further, it is stated that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. It is further submitted that another

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8669 of 2022(3) dt.10-08-2022 2/2 co-accused namely, Rampatiya Devi has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.11.2021 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 55921 of 2021. The petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2021, chargesheet has been submitted in this case and is a person with clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Harnaut (Gokhulpur) P.S. Case No. 319 of 2021.

(Khatim Reza, J) annpurna/- U T