Krishna Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13499 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2019 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH, Son of Binod Prasad Singh @ Ranjeet Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Chhatapur, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Chhatapur, Distt - Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Srivastava, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 This case has been heard through video-conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 420, 386, 413, 504, 506, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case as per the written report of Ajit Kumar submitted before the S.H.O., Chatapur Police Station isto the effect that the informant was working as a night manager in the Imperial Residential Hotel at Gurgaon. Coaccused, Imtiaz and the petitioner, Sahwaz Alam who are auto drivers and used to bring guests to the hotel of the informant. Hence, the informant got acquainted with them. In the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13499 of 2020(4) dt.30-06-2020 2/3 meantime, they also acquainted with co-accused, Vicky Yadav. The petitioner and the co-accused, Imtiaz shown the informant on mobile phone an image of 10 grams gold biscuit and suggested that it is available for only Rs.20,000/-. Subsequently, co-accused, Kunal received Rs.3,00,000/- from the informant to supply him gold biscuits, but the gold biscuits could not be supplied to the informant and thereby, the informant was cheated by the accused persons.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and is in custody since 14.11.2019. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The co-accused has been granted provisional bail vide order dated 02.06.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.11727/2020. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail petition.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 288 of 2019 to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13499 of 2020(4) dt.30-06-2020 3/3 However, the court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T