Ramesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13526 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2022 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

RAMESH SINGH S/O LATE DOMAN SINGH R/v- Jangli Bigha, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad, Bihar 2.

ASHOK KUMAR S/O KRISHNA SINGH R/v- Jangli Bigha, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad, Bihar 3.

AMIT KUMAR S/O KRISHNA SINGH R/v- Jangli Bigha, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the named accused persons including these petitioners attacked the informant with deadly weapons. It is further alleged that petitioner no.2 gave iron rod blow on him due to which he sustained injury on his back. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13526 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both sides have sustained injuries. Though there is specific allegation against petitioner no.2 that he assaulted the informant on his back by means of iron rod, but as per the injury report, no injury was found on his back. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 246 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T