Amarjeet Dhangar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19163 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2020 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
AMARJEET DHANGAR SON OF MAHESH DHANGAR 2.
LAKSHMAN DHANGAR SON OF LATE MEGHU DHANGAR BOTH ARE R/O VILL- SAIDPURGHAT P.S- RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTSITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the brother of the informant had gone to attend a feast. He returned late in the night. Again after receiving a call, he went out but did not return. It is stated that the next morning the informant received information about the discovery of the dead body of his brother hanging in the house of Sudhir Dhangar. The informant states that from reliable source, he received information that the ten named accused persons including the two petitioners herein have a hand in the murder of his brother. Amarjeet Dhangar had threatened his brother that this would be his last night. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19163 of 2021(3) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. For an occurrence alleged to have taken place on 1.5.2020, the F.I.R. was registered after a delay of six days with no explanation for the same. Except for raising an unfounded suspicion in the F.I.R., no material has transpired against the petitioners in course of investigation to implicate them with the alleged crime. The petitioners are in custody since 28.9.2020 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the material that has transpired in course of investigation together with the petitioner having remained in custody for over 1 year, the Court directs the two petitioners to be enlarged on bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case no.197 of 2020 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, District Sitamarhi. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T