Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23150/2015bail granted

Ghanshyam Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-08Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23150 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2013 Thana -UDAKISHANGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Ghanshyam Mandal Son of Sri Chhatis Mandal resident of VillageBadiya Tola, P.s- Raghubansh Nagar, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. G.S. Gupta (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under section 392 of the I.P.C It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He is in custody since 11.08.2014. No looted amount has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Other coaccused have been allowed bail and only on the ground that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent his prayer for bail has been rejected. Charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23150 of 2015 (4) dt.08-10-2015 2/2 In the facts and circumstances as stated above, as the petitioner has not been put on T.I. parade as yet and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Udakishunganj, Madhepura in Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 78 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T