Ram Chandra Rai And ORS v. Md. Tanveer Azam
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.2168 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Ram Chandra Rai S/o Late Bhola Rai, 2.
Baiju Rai, S/o Late Sukhdev Rai.
3.
Bhikhari Rai, S/o Late Sukhdev Rai. All are R/o Village- Patiyasha, P.O.- Mirzapur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Munsiffi, Muzaffarpur East, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Md. Tanveer Azam S/o Md. Amir Azam, R/o Village- Patiyasha, P.O.- Mirzapur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Munsiffi, Muzaffarpur East, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 On call, none appears on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Perusal of record shows even on the last date of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It seems the petitioners have lost interest in their case.
3. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) balmukund/- U