Sultana Khatun @ Kabira Khatun @ Kabirun Nisha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18398 of 2017 ====================================================== Sultana Khatun @ Kabira Khatun @ Kabirun Nisha Wife of Md. Shahabuddin Resident of Village- Kharail Parsa Punarwas Ward No. 16, Supaul, P.O. Supaul, P.S. Supaul, Block- Supaul, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Water Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Supaul.

4.

The L.R.D.C. Supaul.

5.

The Circle Officer, Supaul.

6.

The Rehabilitation Officer, Koshi Project, Supaul. 7.

Md. Nizam Son of late Md. Aziz Resident of Village- Kharail Parsa Punarwas Ward No. 16, Supaul, P.O. Supaul, P.S. Supaul, District- Supaul852131 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar-SC-11 Mr. Piyush Kumar Pandey, AC to SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in paragraph-6 to 9 of the second supplementary counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.6, it has been stated that in response to the letters written by the Rehabilitation Officer, the Circle Officer, Supaul has informed that vide letter no.616 dated 05.02.2025 encroachment proceeding has been initiated against the encroachers vide Encroachment Case No.07 of 2024-25 for removal of encroachment from the land in question and in that

Patna High Court CWJC No.18398 of 2017(4) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 course notices have been issued to them.

2. In view of the aforesaid development which has taken place during the pendency of the present writ application, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further cause of action survives in the present writ application and therefore the present writ application may kindly be disposed of in light of the aforesaid development.

3. As prayed for, the present writ application is disposed of in light of the fact that no cause of action now survives for the petitioner to pursue in the present writ application.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U