Kameshwar Singh @ Dhuran Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12087 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2020 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

KAMESHWAR SINGH @ DHURAN SINGH S/O LATE BHUTAI SINGH R/v- Chintamanpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran 2.

RICHU KUMARI D/O KAMESHWAR SINGH @ DHURAN SINGH R/vChintamanpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that his daughter was married to the son of the petitioner No. 1 in the year 2018 and after marriage, a Maruti Car was being demanded along with other articles, it is next submitted that for non-fulfillment of the same, his daughter was killed.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are a persons with clean antecedent and petitioner No. 1 is father-in-law of the deceased and petitioner No. 2 is unmarried sisterin-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12087 of 2023(2) dt.21-06-2023 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant herself has alleged that the petitioner No. 1 along with his wife were not staying in the house rather were conspiring from outside which amply demonstrates that in a mechanical manner, the petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 2 have been implicated in the present case when the allegation against the petitioner No. 2 is also not specific.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 337 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T