Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11174/2025bail rejected

Vivek Kumar Singh @ Dara Singh @ Vivek Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-20Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11174 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Vivek Kumar Singh @ Dara Singh @ Vivek Singh Son of Late Umesh Singh Resident of Village- Kareya,P.S.- Risiuap, District- Aurangabad 2.

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh @ Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh Son of Dukhan Singh Resident of Village- Kareya,P.S.- Risiuap, District- Aurangabad 3.

Ujjwal Kumar Singh @ Ujjwal Singh Son of Late Rajeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Kareya,P.S.- Risiuap, District- Aurangabad 4.

Sanjay Kumar @ Papu Singh @ Pappu Singh @ Sanjay Singh Son of Late Rajeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Kareya,P.S.- Risiuap, DistrictAurangabad 5.

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh Son of Pukar Singh Resident of Village- Kareya,P.S.- Risiuap, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This is second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the petition, filed for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, stood rejected, vide order dated 04.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61153 of 2024.

3. This application does not reveal any change of circumstances or new ground.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11174 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/2

4. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anrs reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, the second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) kiran/- U T