Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9082/2025bail rejected

Kishun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9082 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2024 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Kishun Yadav S/O Hari Lal Yadav R/O Gaushala, Gaurashni, Mangrauni P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Rajnagar PS. Case No.-451 of 2024 dated 27.11.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 281 and 106(2) of B.N.S, 2023.

3. As per allegation, a nine years old daughter of the informant has been crushed to death by rash and negligent driving of tractor bearing Registration No. BR-32GB-8646 and it has been found that the petitioner herein was the driver of the said vehicle at the relevant time.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9082 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 case. He further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has no intention to cause death.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and death of the minor child by rash and negligent driving by the petitioner, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T