Anil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8933 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2020 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Anil Chaudhary Son of Rajendra Chaudhary Resident of Village - Sahora, P.s.- Atari, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 341, 307, 379, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted the son of the informant and her family members.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that this case is counter blast of Atari P.S. Case No. 196 of 2020. The petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2021, charge sheet has been submitted in this case and has antecedent of five cases.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8933 of 2022(2) dt.13-07-2022 2/2 regular bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Atari P.S. Case No. 195 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every dated fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) One of the bailors will be his own blood relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Khatim Reza, J) shweta/- U T