← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9167/2018disposed

Vinod Kumar Agrawal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-17Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9167 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Vinod Kumar Agrawal, Son of Ganeshi lal Agrawal Director of MICAR SHARING TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD. KH NO. 337 SATBIR BUILDING, NEAR SULTANPUR, NEW DELHI, Resident of House No.- 35, Lane W10-c Block-H Sainik Farm, Pushpa Bhawan, Hauz Khas, Police StationSouth Delhi South Delhi- Delhi- 110062. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas.

5. The Excise Superintendent, District- Rohtas.

6. The SHO Police Station- Kochas, District- Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad- Gp7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-05-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle NISSAN TERRANO XLD bearing Registration No. DL1N 6746, which has been seized in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No.88/2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings

Patna High Court CWJC No.9167 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the aforesaid confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner, on his furnishing Bank Guarantee to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Rohtas and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question or create a third party interest during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case or prejudice the right of the State in confiscation proceeding. The aforesaid vehicle shall be released within one week from the date of furnishing of the Bank Guarantee. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U