Vishal Shah v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3360 of 2024 ====================================================== Vishal Shah, son of Binay Kumar Shah, Resident of 64/65 Shri Arobindo Raod, Salkia, Howrah, Rakhee Cinema Comples, 2nd floor, District- Howrah, West Bengal- 711106, Current Address- 816 W Royal LN, Irving, Texas, 75039 United State of America. Mob- 410-940-9992. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi.
2.
The Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi. 3.
Monalish Gupta, Wife of Vishal Shal, Resident of 64/65 Shri Arobindo Raod, Salkia, Howrah, Rakhee Cinema Complex, 2nd floor, DistrictHowrah, West Bengal- 711106. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gaurav Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Addl. S.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties including learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
2.
The petitioner is challenging the Look Out Circular issued by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur in Matrimonial (Restitution) Case No.280 of 2018 vide orders dated 30.08.2018 and 31.08.2018 and also the orders dated 06.09.2019 and 27.09.2019 passed in Matrimonial (Restitution) Case No. 280 of 2018.
3.
The petitioner has appeared in the Family Court. He is also pursuing his legal remedies before this Court by way of filing an Anticipatory bail application and the matter is pending before the Mediation Centre.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3360 of 2024(2) dt.18-03-2024 2/2 4.
In these circumstances, the orders dated 30.08.2018 and 31.08.2018 for issuance of Look Out Circular against the petitioner as well as the orders dated 06.09.2019 and 27.09.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, in Matrimonial (Restitution) Case No.280 of 2018 are hereby quashed. Consequently, the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner is directed to be recalled by the respondent no.2.
5.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this this writ petition is allowed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U