← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19790/2021rejected

Parmeshar Verma @ Parmeshwar Verma @ Parmeshwar Barma v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-07Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19790 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2019 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran ====================================================== PARMESHAR VERMA @ PARMESHWAR VERMA @ PARMESHWAR BARMA SON OF LATE RAJDEO MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGESARYUPAR, P.S- DAUDPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bishwajeet Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 259 of 2019 registered under Sections 323, 406, 498-A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner is the husband of the informant. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that on perusal of first information report, it appears that there is direct allegation of demand of dowry against the petitioner. Hence,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19790 of 2021(4) dt.07-02-2022 2/2 petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T