Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26456/2015bail granted

Shambhu Kumar @ Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-09Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26456 of 2015 (3) dt.09-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26456 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Shambhu Kumar @ Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Kumar Yadav son of Balkeshwar Yadav, resident of Village/ Mohalla- Dhanaw, P.S.- Jamour, District- Aurangabad and at Present Resident of Raja Bazar, Salimpur Dumra, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 30 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly from possession of the petitioner a 7.65 loaded pistol over which USA was written and five live cartridges of 7.65 bore and black colour Nokia mobile were recovered on 14.2.2015, and since then, the petitioner is in custody. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery and period of detention, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26456 of 2015 (3) dt.09-10-2015 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur arising out of Shahpur P.S. Case No. 30 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U