← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10227/2018disposed

Sulekha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-08-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10227 of 2018 ====================================================== Sulekha Kumari wife of Amarendra Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhelwa Ward No. 4, P.S.- Gamhariya, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

3.

The Director, ICDS, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Block Development Officer, Gamahriya, Madhepura. 5.

The Block Child Development Officer, Gamahriya, Madhepura. 6.

Ranju Kumari wife of Rajdev Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhelwa Ward No. 4, P.S.- Gamhariya, District- Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bidhanesh Misra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha -GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for quashing the selection of Ranju Kumari (Respondent No.6) as Aaganwadi Sevika in Panchayat Bhelwa, Ward No. 4 Mini Aaganwadi Kendra No. 72 and select the petitioner as Aganwadi Sevika in Panchayat Bhelwa, Ward No. 4 Mini Aaganwadi Kendra No. 72.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28.08.2017 passed in Aganwadi Appeal No. 9 of 2016 by the Collector-cum-District

Patna High Court CWJC No.10227 of 2018(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 Magistrate, Madhepura.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that in the said appeal, the petitioner is not the party, and in compliance of the order passed in the appeal fresh advertisement has been made. As such, the petitioner has only remedy to challenge the appointment of the private respondent according to the relevant guidelines for the appointment of Anganwadi Sevika-Sahayika.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions mentioned in the guideline for the appointment of Anganbari Sevika-Sahayika.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U