← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9290/2022bail granted

Anil Tuddu v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9290 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2019 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== ANIL TUDDU S/o Sukra Tudu R/o village- Chandasol, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jammui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akshansh Ankit For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandramandhi P.S. Case no. 115 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b) a/26 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret information, police party proceeded towards on spot, and found that antisocial persons were assembled there to hatch a conspiracy. On seeing the police party, they started to run away but on chase five accused persons were apprehended and some looted items were recovered. Accused Virendra Yadav has disclosed the name of the present petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9290 of 2022(2) dt.10-08-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed in this case by the apprehended co-accused, namely, Virendra Yadav, which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Neither the petitioner was arrested nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Chandramandhi P.S. Case no. 115 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.- IV, Jammui subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U