Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9735 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar Sah Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Village- Khajuri Ward No. 08, P.s.- Bhargama, Distt.- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 109, 121(1), 121(2), 61(2), 132, 324(4), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have attacked on the police personnel by lathi-danda and stones due to which half dozen police officials got injured and police vehicle was also damaged.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9735 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. Nothing specific has been attributed against him. He was not present at the place of occurrence. His name has been transpired in the present case due to ill motive of local Chaukidar. The injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below shall pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T