Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50777 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2014 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Pintu Yadav, son of College Yadav, Resident of village- Bahrampur Bigha, Police Station- Dhanarua, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 175/2014 registered under sections 304(B), 201/34 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Masauri.
The accusation is that daughter of the informant, namely, Rupa Devi, was married to the petitioner Pintu Yadav two years ago, but due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, the daughter of the informant has been killed by the accused persons, including the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner is the husband of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50777 of 2015 (3) dt.05-02-2016 2/2 deceased and there is also a male issue aged about one year due to their wedlock, but unfortunately she died due to sudden illness. While she was rushed to hospital for her treatment but she died in the way, thereafter, her dead body was cremated. Learned counsel for the State submits that admittedly, the petitioner is the husband of the deceased, and deceased died within two years of the marriage and her dead body was said to be disposed of without giving any information to the informant.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T