← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5259/2019allowed

Aniket Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-09Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5259 of 2019 ====================================================== Aniket Kumar aged about 20 years (Male) s/o Ashok Kumar Singh R/o Village-Trawan, Karnaul Chaturbhuj, P.S. Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Excise Commissioner, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Station Head Officer, P.S. Sadar District Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Investigation Officer of Sadar P.S. Case No.679/18, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad (GP7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 09-04-2019 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the State is present.

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Splendor Plus Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR-06BK6682, which has been seized in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 679 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. It is informed by learned counsel for the State that the seizure list reflects the seizure of 10.800 liters of I.M.F.L. He

Patna High Court CWJC No.5259 of 2019 dt.09-04-2019 2/3 further informs that there is pleading to the effect that confiscation proceeding has not yet been initiated. Having heard learned counsel for the State and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding, as and when initiated, and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period. (iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and

Patna High Court CWJC No.5259 of 2019 dt.09-04-2019 3/3 when required.

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, the designated Court below would got prepared a Panchanama wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release of the vehicle would, however, be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.04.2019 Transmission Date NA