Manish Kumar Raj @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7617 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2019 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR RAJ @ MANISH KUMAR Son of Ajay Singh Resident of Village- Suggasot, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Ranjan Devi W/o Manish Kumar Raj @ Manish Kumar, D/o Late Bhrigunath Singh Resident of Village- Jamuna, P.S.- Imamganj, DistrictGaya. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP For the Informant : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-07-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned counsel appearing for the informant.

Petitioner seeks bail in Imamganj PS Case No. 41 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 506 and 498(A) of the IPC.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is willing to reconcile the issue with his wife. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will make all genuine efforts to reconcile the issue

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7617 of 2020(2) dt.08-07-2020 2/2 so that the reconciliation culminates in restoration of matrimonial harmony or one time settlement as agreed upon between the petitioner and the informant.

Learned Counsel for the informant does not object to such proposal as long as amicable settlement is reached between the parties.

In view of the said submission since terms of reconciliation has to be worked out, this Court would direct that if the petitioner surrenders in the court below, i.e. the Court of Judicial Magistrate lst Class, Sherghati (Gaya). within a period of four weeks from today, in connection with Imamganj PS Case No. 41 of 2019, and submits an undertaking to this effect at the time of his surrender, the court below, after issuing notice to Opposite party No. 2 (wife) will grant provisional bail to the petitioner. The parties would make attempt to work out for resolution of the dispute and the matter would be reviewed by the court below after three months. This court makes it clear that if the issue is resolved amicably, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner should be confirmed. If the developments are, however otherwise, the court below would be free to pass order in exercise of its judicial discretion, including cancellation of the provisional bail granted to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations the application stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T