Santosh Sahani @ Santosh Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47438 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2013 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Santosh Sahani @ Santosh Kumar Sahani, son of Raja Ram Sahani resident of village - Lallu Pokher, Gorhi Tola, Police Station - Kasim Bazaar, District- Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 414, 225, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.
Considering that no Arms were recovered from the possession of the Petitioner who has fair antecedent, let the Petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Kashim Bazar P.S. Case No. 129 of 2013 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47438 of 2014 (2) dt.12-01-2015 2/2 close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other shall be the cousin brother of the Petitioner namely, Ranjeet Sahani. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail.
(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T