← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1568/2018dismissed

Ram Prit Prasad v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-01-25Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1568 of 2018 =========================================================== Ram Prit Prasad, Son of Late Devnarayan, Resident of Village Narsinghdhar, P.S.- Mali District- Deoria (U.P.).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chief General Manager, Railway Department, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. The Zonal Manager Sonepur Division, East Central Railway, Sonepur, Bihar.

3. The Divisional Railway Manager, Sonepur, Bihar,

4. The Divisional Railway Manager (Karmik), East Central Railway, Sonepur, Bihar.

5. The Assistant Divisional Signal Executive Engineer (West), Barauni, DistrictBegusarai.

6. The Station Master, Railway Station Khagaria, District- Khagaria. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar No. 1 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shatrughan Pandey =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 25-01-2018 The dismissal of O.A. No. 735 of 2017 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench Patna dated 24.11.2017 is subject matter of challenge in the writ application. If the Tribunal dismissed the O.A. application for the reason that an earlier O.A. application stood dismissed and such a factual position was not even stated in the new O.A. application, even

Patna High Court CWJC No.1568 of 2018 dt.25-01-2018 2/2 if the earlier dismissal was for the technical reason, then obviously the effort was made to conceal the fact which is not appreciable and that is to why the Tribunal has said that they take strong view of the conduct of the applicant or the counsel in an effort to conceal information.

Even otherwise, since the petitioner has long retired now the benefit of LARGESS Scheme cannot be extended now. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/Arjun AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date29.01.2018 Transmission Date NA