Raja Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10317 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2016 Thana- Chiksaur District- Nalanda ====================================================== Raja Yadav, aged about 75 years, Gender - Male, Son of Late Ram Udit Singh, Resident of Village - Naugarh, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satyavrat Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.
13-03-2019 Heard Sri Satyavrat Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Prasad Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.
This is 2nd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in Chiksaur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2016, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 182 of 2017. The prayer for bail of petitioner was recently rejected on 18-08-2018, vide Cr. Misc. No. 48213 of 2018. In this case, by order dated 27-02-2019, a report was called for from the court below regarding stage of the case, which has been received. The report, contained in letter no. 90 dated 06-03-2019, sent under the signature of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Hilsa, Nalanda is kept at flag 'X', which indicates that out of 13 chargesheeted witnesses, 9 witnesses
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10317 of 2019(3) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 including informant have already been examined and steps are being taken to examine remaining witnesses.
Sri Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for directing the court below to conclude the trial within specified time, whereas, Sri Anil Prasad Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, on the strength of report, submits that trial is already going on and learned trial court has already taken steps for securing attendance of remaining witnesses. Besides this, paragraph - 3 of the petition shows that the petitioner is accused in other three cases also. In that view of the matter, there is no need to pass any favourable order. The prayer for bail again stands rejected.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T