← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3031/2022disposed

Bhola Prasad, v. The State Of Bihar,

2022-03-11The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3031 of 2022 ====================================================== Bhola Prasad, Son of Late Vasudev Ram, Mohalla - Mathuriya (Sherpur Bazar), P.O. - Biharsharif, P.S. - Laheri, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

4.

District Magistrate - Cum - Collector, Nalanda. 5.

Additional Collector, Nalanda.

6.

Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Hilsa.

7.

Circle Officer, Ekangarsarai (Nalanda) 8.

Shailendra Prasad, Son of Late Devki Gope Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

9.

Ashok Prasad, Son of Late Devki Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

10.

Jaisar Prasad, Son of Ramnand Gope Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

11.

Nandu Prasad, Son of Ramanand Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

12.

Rajendra Prasad, Son of Late Ramlakhan Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

13.

Vijay Prasad, Son of Late Ramchandra Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

14.

Akhilesh Prasad, Son of Late Suresh Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

15.

Vinod Prasad, Son of Late Ramlakhan Gope, Resident of Manpur, P.S. - Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indradeo Prasad, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore ( A.G.) Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

2/4 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) Date : 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under instructions, states that a direction be issued to dispose of the appeal pending before the District Magistrate, Nalanda. As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (a) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal on merits, in compliance of the principles of natural justice; (f) The Appellate Authority shall pass a reasoned and speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of order passed by this Court; (g) Copy of the reasoned and speaking order passed by the Appellate Authority shall be supplied to the parties; (h) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(j) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and all issues are left open;

The instant petition sands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

4/4 Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date