Lalbabu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10283 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Lalbabu Prasad Son of Late Rangilal Prasad R/o Village - Khawaspur, P.S. - Lakri Naviganj, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhya, Advocate Mrs.Tetara Kumari, Advocate Mr. Raju Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with other named accused persons attacked the informant side. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted on the head of the informant by means of iron rod causing injury to him.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on the head of the informant by iron rod, but the injury report

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10283 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 suggests no injury specifically on the head of the informant, although injury was on finger and shoulder and the opinion was kept reserved, but there is no final report regarding the same. There happens to be serious land dispute between the parties and there is counter version of the present occurrence also and the petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2025 and although he is accused in one another case, but is on bail in that case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that there is no corresponding injury on the person of the informant and all the injured persons have received simple injuries, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025.

(Praveen Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T