Md. Kasim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10997 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Kasim Ansari Son of Isa Ansari Resident of Eid Mohammad Chowk, Ragho Nagar Bhowara, Ward No. 28, P.S. and District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3.

The Collector, Madhubani.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Chairman, Sunni Waqf Board, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Chief Executive Officer, Sunni Waqf Board, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Advocate Ms. Jyoti Joshi, Advocate Ms. Md. Ghulam Mustafa, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 Mr. Wasi Ahmad Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to SC-25.

The writ application has been filed seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to take a decision on the Waqf Property dedicated to Sunni Waqf executed by a registered deed of Waqfnama Fisbilillah dated 29.12.1979 so that the property dedicated to Sunni Waqf may not be alienated, encroached and grabbed by the antisocial and unscrupulous elements. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before the Chairman, Sunni

Patna High Court CWJC No.10997 of 2018 dt.06-04-2023 2/2 Waqf Board and the Chief Executive Officer, Sunni Waqf Board, Patna on 09.05.2018 seeking the relief for which the present writ application has been filed.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the writ application may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 5 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the submission made by the State Counsel.

Considering the submission made by the parties, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 5 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.04.2023 Transmission Date