Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52624/2015bail granted

Ramesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-12-17Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52624 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2014 Thana -CHANPATIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Ramesh Paswan Son of Yadu Paswan Resident of Village - Gidha, P.S.- Chanpatiya, District - West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 17-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the recovery was allegedly made in the absence of the petitioner, therefore, it cannot be construed that the same has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is further contended that the petitioner's antecedent is clean.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Ramesh Paswan, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52624 of 2015 (2) dt.17-12-2015 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in Chanpatiya P.S. Case No. 214/14 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his / her relationship with him. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U