Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9802/2020bail granted

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-28Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9802 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2019 Thana- KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL KUMAR PANDEY S/o Late Sant Kumar Pandey Resident of Village- Bheriahi Salona, P.S.- Kanti, Distt- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate.

Ms. Kanchan Kumari, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.294 of 2019 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In fact, the petitioner was in custody in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.261 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, in which the police got recorded the confessional statement of the petitioner, showing his involvement in the present case. Thereafter, the petitioner was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9802 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 remanded in the present case on 19.11.2019 and since then he is in custody.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (West) Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.294 of 2019. Out of the two sureties, one must be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T