← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11764/2025bail granted

Nawal Kishor Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-25Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11764 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1344 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Nawal Kishor Singh Son of Janki Singh village- pathal Bangala, ps- Chora Pokhar, Dhanbad, Jharkhand 2.

Kailash Ramani @ Kailash Prasad son of Late Nago Ramani village- Jhariya khanudih, ps- Jhariya , Dhanbad Dist- Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Jamui Prohibition PS Case bearing Jam Case No. 1344 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 198.750 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from Tempo. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11764 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 submitted that petitioner no. 1 and 2 both are the drivers of the seized vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioners and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jamui Prohibition PS Case bearing Jam Case No. 1344 of 2024 (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T