Prof. Uma Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1161 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2016 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna ====================================================== Prof. Uma Shankar Yadav, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Ramanand Yadav, Permanent resident of Sneh Sadan, Daroga Rai Chowk, Chapra, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar in the District and Town- Chapra, Presently working as Proctor, Jai Prakash University, Saran at Chapra, Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, through the Director General, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna
2. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Officer-in-charge Vigilance Police Station, Patna.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Vigilance Police Station, Patna
4. Jai Prakash University through the Registrar, Chapra, Saran
5. Paras Nath, Son of not known to the petitioner, Dy. S.P.-cum-Investigating Officer, Vigilance P.S. Case No. 101 of 2016, 6 Circular Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ajay Mishra, AC to Law Officer, Vigilance ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the writ petition has been filed for quashing the FIR of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 101 of 2016 dated 07.10.2016 registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 472, 477A, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, during pendency of the writ petition, the investigation has been
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1161 of 2016(2) dt.07-01-2019 2/2 competed and the petitioner has not been sent up for trial. In view of the submissions made above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/SKSuman.
U T