← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16969/2015dismissed

Pushpa Rani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-11Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16969 of 2015 =========================================================== Pushpa Rani daughter of Shri Shambhu Nath Ram resident of village - Dashratha, New Bypass Road, P.O. - Anishabad, P.S. - Beur, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Patna, Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chairman, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Competitive Examination Board, IAS Bhawan, Patna.

5. The Director General of Health Services, Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi.

6. The Medical Council of India, New Delhi - 110077 through its Secretary. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Chhitaranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate.

Mr. Bindeshwar Kumar, Advocate.

For the BCECEB : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate.

For the Union of India : Mr. Satyavrat Verma, Advocate. (CGC) For the Respondents : Mr. SC33-RITESH KUMAR For the MCI : Mr. Kumar Brijnandan, Advocate.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-02-2016 All the issues raised by the petitioner now remain settled. The cut off date fixed by the Hon'ble Apex Court for MBBS examination is 30th September of every year, however, this year it was extended till 7th October by a judicial direction. The admissions are long past over. The Court is not required to now go into reasons or otherwise.

In view of the above, relief with regard to admission or a direction in this regard cannot be issued.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16969 of 2015 dt.11-02-2016 2/2 In the alternative learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays for compensation on the basis of ratio of decision rendered in the case of S. Nihaal Ahamed v. Velammal Medical College Hospital & Research Institute and Ors. reported in (2016) 1 SCC 662. The occasion for grant of compensation has no foundation in this case. In absence of any categorical finding as to the extraneous reason for refusal to grant admission, writ is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) KKSINHA/- U .