Ram Prasad Mehta And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10700 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2017 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Ram Prasad Mehta Son of Ganesh Mehta Resident of Village and Police Station- Risiup 2.
Sheopujan Mehta Son of Late Balram Mehta Resident of Village - Ratanpura Toal, Ramjivan Bigha 3.
Pramod Kumar Mehta Resident of Village - Pawai Toli Bijhar, P.S - Muffasil, Aurangabad All are District in Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ganga Son of Lakhan Mahto Resident of Village and Police Station- Risiup , Distt. - Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 228 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 327, 504 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal code.
Allegation as per the complaint is that the complainant has purchased the land from Lakhan Mahto and Lakhan Mahto had sold that land to petitioner no.2 and petitioner nos.1 and 3 are the witnesses of the said sale-deed. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10700 of 2019(3) dt.26-04-2019 2/2 that petitioner no.2 had purchased the land from Lakhan Mahto who is father of complainant and the petitioner no.1 and 3 are witnesses and as such the allegation is false and concocted and the case is of civil nature.
Heard A.P.P. also.
Having heard both parties, in view of the facts and circumstances as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-( Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 228 of 2017, subject to that condition that laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amjad/- U T