Heera Lal Rajvanshi @ Heera Lal @ Hira Rajwanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9662 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Heera Lal Rajvanshi @ Heera Lal @ Hira Rajwanshi S/O Visheshwar Rajvanshi R/O Village- Manaini, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 460 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 290, 283, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. 1st , Gaya.

As per the prosecution case, the police has arrested two persons from the village. It is alleged that when the police party proceeded from there along with aforesaid arrested accused persons, several persons made rampage and stopped police jeep and forcibly released the arrested persons from police custody.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9662 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to only being the brother of the one co-accused Akhilesh Rajvanshi. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioner is also one of the member of the said syndicate and the petitioner is also involved in the present case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T