Chandan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9586 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2018 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== CHANDAN PRAKASH Son of Sukhnandan Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.- Kansari, P.S.- Gaurichak, Dist.-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 323, 341, 354, 498A, 506, 504/341 IPC registered in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 104/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event he expresses his readiness to keep his wife, the informant, with due dignity and honour. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM VII, Patna City, in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 104/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9586 of 2019(2) dt.18-02-2019 2/2 conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T