Satya Narayan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52400 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2015 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Satya Narayan Kumar, Son of Haricharan Saw, Resident of Village - Ithat, P.S. Baroon, District Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Manager, the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Aurangabad.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the State : Smt. Anuradha Singh (App) For O.P.No.2 : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner being the rice miller has allegedly lifted paddy and he was required to return 10477.80 quintals rice after milling but he has merely returned 4050.00 quintals of rice. According to the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, the amount equivalent to 6427.80 quintals of rice would come to approximately a sum of Rs.1,39,19,805/-. Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Satya Narayan Kumar is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52400 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Baroon P.S. Case No.51/2015, with a further condition that he would deposit 20% of the aforesaid amount before the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna and a receipt showing such payment should be deposited by the petitioner within six months. If the same is not deposited within the aforesaid period, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
It is made clear that the deposit of such amount would be subject to the result of the criminal case. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T