Gudiya Devi @ Guriya Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12509 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2022 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Gudiya Devi @ Guriya Kumari, aged about 34 years, (Female), Wife Of Jitendra Kumar, R/O Village- Rupaspur, Sahai Nagar, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mrs. Rina Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 309 of 2022 for the offence registered under Sections 30(a), 56 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 140 liters wine is said to have been recovered from the Tempo in question.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. She has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12509 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/3 no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 140 liters wine is recovered from the Tempo in question. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of seized Tempo in question. The petitioner is alleged to be the owner of the said Tempo. The said Tempo is run as a public transport. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the said Tempo. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3005 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari-Versus-The State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12509 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 3/3 the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Excise Court, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 309 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T