Md. Afroz v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51684 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -869 Year- 2010 Thana -KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE DistrictKHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Afroz Son of Md. Azaz Resident of Village Panchveer, Police Station Sahebpur Kamal, District Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shamshida Khatoon Daughter of Md. Yusuf Resident of Village Roun, Police Station Allauli, District Khagaria.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kr.Srivastava(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 14-12-2015 Heard Mr. Vivekanand Singh for the petitioner and Mr. Dayal, APP for the State.

Petitioner is husband of the complainant and is seeking bail in Complaint Case No. 869C of 2010 lodged under Section 498A Indian Penal Code.

It is stated relying on the statement made in the petition that even though he has been lodged in the jail custody but if released on bail, he will make sincere effort to resolve the matrimonial discord and to take his wife back in the matrimonial home with full dignity and honour.

Considering the above, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51684 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015 2/2 to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Khagaria in Complaint Case No. 869C of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T