Md. Afroj Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9059 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-644 Year-2021 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== MD. FIRDOS ALAM @ MD. FIRDOS ANSARI S/o Md. Khurshid Ansari R/o Mohalla- Munir Colony, Lal Miyan Dargah, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10966 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-644 Year-2021 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== MD. AFROJ ANSARI SON OF MD. KHURSHID ANSARI R/O MOHALLA- MUNIR COLONY, LAL MIYAN DARGAH, P.S.- PHULWARISHARIF, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9059 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madhuri Lata (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10966 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-05-2022 Both the petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners pray for grant of bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9059 of 2022(3) dt.19-05-2022 2/2 As per prosecution case, informant alleged that his elder brother Firoz Ansari went for painting work on 30.8.2021 and did not return till evening and on the following day information was received regarding an unidentified dead body near the railway track, then the informant and his brother went there and found that it was of his brother. Informant suspects that unknown persons committed the murder of his brother.
Petitioners are not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioners surfaced during investigation in confessional statement of co-accused. Saurav Kumar, son and wife of the deceased have stated that there was dispute between the petitioners and the deceased due to black magic. No one claimed to have seen the occurrence. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Danapur, Patna in Bihta P.S. Case no. 644/2021.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T