Surendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.338 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7952 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Surendra Prasad Son of Ram Ishwar Prasad Resident of Village- Mandachh, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.

2.

Manoj Malakar Son of Sarup Malakar Resident of Village- Mandachh, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.

3.

Shashi Bhushan Sharma Son of Shukhdeo Sharma Resident of VillageMandachh, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda. 4.

Pankaj Kumar Son of Surendra Sharma Resident of Village- Mandachh, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Deepal Kumar Singh The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Chaitanaya Prasad the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Alok Raj, the Director General of Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Sri Shashank Shubhankar, the District Magistrate, Nalanda. 6.

Sri Kishan Prasad the District Education Officer, Nalanda. 7.

Sri Rajesh Kumar, the Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, 17, Harding Road, Patna-800001 8.

Sri Satendra Kuamr Sharma , the Senior Teacher-CUm-Incharge, Head Master, Ram Briksha Sanskrit Primary-Cum-Middle School Mandachchha, Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar. Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA 12 For the Vigilance :

Mr.Anil Singh, Adv.

For the Board :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha & Mr. S.S.Sundaram, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court MJC No.338 of 2023(9) dt.19-07-2024 2/2 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 19-07-2024 From perusal of the record, it is evident that limited direction of the co-ordinate Bench is to consider the petitioners' representation by the concerned authority. The official respondents made various correspondences and ultimately passed an order of compliance in the month of April, 2024.

2. Accordingly, the present contempt proceeding stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority if he has still grievance to be redressed.

3. Imposition of cost on previous occasion has not been paid by the State to the petitioners. The same shall be paid during course of the day, failing which further cost of Rs. 5,000/- is imposed for violation of the order of this Court. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcv/- U