← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7772/2020dismissed

Fantush Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-28Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7772 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2019 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== FANTUSH YADAV Son of Chan Kishore Yadav @ Chandra Kishore Yadav Resident of Village - Mundichak, P.S.- Salkhua (OP Banma Ithari), District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiva Shankar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act.

Informant has alleged in his written complaint that on 01.09.2019 at about 4.30 PM his son and his villager Lallan Yadav had gone to Market. In the meantime, Bijendra Yadav gave order to Ramesh Yadav to kill both of them. Guddu Yadav and Pappu Yadav surrounded them, thereafter Dinesh Yadav and Uday Yadav caught hold the hands of his son and Ramesh Yadav, Baiju Yadav, Guddu Yadav, Prabeen Yadav and Jai Chandra Yadav shot his son and Raushan Yadav, Mahadev

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7772 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 Yadav, Fantush Yadav (petitioner) shot Lallan Yadav, as a result of which his son and Lallan Yadav died. It is alleged that the informant and Naresh Yadav, Mithilesh Yadav, Rajo Yadav, Manoj Yadav Hire Devi,and Kajal Devi had witnessed the occurrence.

There is direct allegation against petitioner that he shot Lallan Yadav, as a result of which he died. Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly this application is dismissed. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T